Last year when I was at JSM, I attended an excellent talk by Nicholas Horton and later nitpicked his R code:
ifelse(dest == "ORD" | dest == "MDW", TRUE, FALSE)
There is no need to use ifelse() here. The code above is equivalent to:
dest == "ORD" | dest == "MDW"
I have a feeling that some people are not comfortable when they think about Boolean values without literally seeing the values TRUE or FALSE. I think this is understandable. Personally I try to avoid redundancy, unless I’m explicitly thinking of the Department of Redundancy Department.
I also often see people write code like if (x == TRUE). The == TRUE part is redundant in my eyes: if (x) is enough. I think there is a slight visual benefit of explicitly comparing x with TRUE, though. That is, when glancing at the code, you can quickly know there is a Boolean comparison here, because the keyword TRUE is visually prominent.
A few minutes ago I saw yet another example of redundancy in the article “Flawed code served as icing on the cake for Prime Minister’s social agency launch”. The last line of the R code on the cake was like:
minister_greeting = ifelse(welcomeSpeech == TRUE, "....")
This line was quite interesting in several aspects:
-
It is flawed because the third argument of the
ifelse()function was missing (with no default). -
Again, there is redundancy in
welcomeSpeech == TRUE:ifelse(welcomeSpeech)suffices. However, I think this redundancy is understandable since the cake is for someone who (I assume) do not really know much about R, andifelse(welcomeSpeech == TRUE)may make the code a little more readable to them. -
The author of this piece of code used the left arrow
<-for assignments on all previous lines, but changed to the equal sign=on the last line. As you all probably know, I use the euqal sign all the time (except when I collaborate with someone who insists on using the arrow), so I’d like to say “Welcome to the dark side and long live the equal sign!” -
Similarly, the author used snake_case everywhere, and suddenly changed to camelCase when naming the variable
welcomeSpeech. Consistency is hard.
Donate
As a freelancer (currently working as a contractor) and a dad of three kids, I truly appreciate your donation to support my writing and open-source software development! Your contribution helps me cope with financial uncertainty better, so I can spend more time on producing high-quality content and software. You can make a donation through methods below.
-
Venmo:
@yihui_xie, or Zelle:xie@yihui.name -
Paypal
-
If you have a Paypal account, you can follow the link https://paypal.me/YihuiXie or find me on Paypal via my email
xie@yihui.name. Please choose the payment type as “Family and Friends” (instead of “Goods and Services”) to avoid extra fees. -
If you don’t have Paypal, you may donate through this link via your debit or credit card. Paypal will charge a fee on my side.
-
-
Other ways:
WeChat Pay (微信支付:谢益辉) Alipay (支付宝:谢益辉) 

When sending money, please be sure to add a note “gift” or “donation” if possible, so it won’t be treated as my taxable income but a genuine gift. Needless to say, donation is completely voluntary and I appreciate any amount you can give.
Please feel free to email me if you prefer a different way to give. Thank you very much!
I’ll give back a significant portion of the donations to the open-source community and charities. For the record, I received about $30,000 in total (before tax) in 2024-25, and gave back about $15,000 (after tax).